Monica Zapata

One childs record did not contain the required emergency contact address.

One childs record did not contain the updated immunization record.

Two dogs observed at the operation did not have the required documenation of vaccinations.

Two caregivers were observed with seven students ages 8 months, 2,3,3,3, 4 and 4 years old. The registered home is out of ratio by one student.

The operation did not have the required list of children transported for January 7th, 2026. Note: This was corrected during the inspection.

The emergency medical information and authorization was not provided forthree out of four students transported.

The sign in log was observed with four students out of seven students signed in.

The television was observed on while students participated in table top activities.

Two caregivers were observed with seven students ages 17 months, 2,2,3,3,3 and 5 years old. The registered home is out of ratio by one student.

Three dogs observed at the operation did not have the required documenation of vaccinations.

The operation did not have a emergency and evacuation diagram availabile. Note: This was corrected during the inspection.

Two student records did not contain the required health statement.

The sign in log was observed not completed. Note: A photo was taken.

Sheltering weather drills were not documented for the month of November. Note: A photo was taken.

Students were not observed washing hands before participating in activity with cheerios.

One student records did not contain the required immunizations.

The operations pathway to the backyard was observed with hazards. Note: A photo was taken.

The emergency medical information and authorization was not provided for students transported.

The operation did not have a number/child assignment map available.

A five year old student was observed on youtube during activity time.

The primary caregiver and assistant caregiver had seven students ages 5 years, 5 years,4 years,3 years,3 years,2 years and 2 years old. The operation was over ratio by one student.

A six month old infant was observed with blankets propped for feeding.

A 6 month old infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in a restrictive device. Note: Pictures were taken.

The primary caregiver and assistant caregiver were observed with twelve students ages 6 months,21 month, 23 months, 2 years, 2 years, 3 years, 3 years, 4 years, 4 years,5 years, 5 years and 5 years.

A six month old infant was observed sleeping in a restrictive device. Note: Picture was taken.

A pool was observed in the backyard without a four feet high fence.

The assistant caregiver was observed with nine students ages 22 months, 2 years, 2 years, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 4 years, 4 years and 5 years.

An above the ground pool was observed accesible to students.

The playground entry was observed without a four foot fence.

The primary caregiver and assistant caregiver were observed with nine students ages 5 months, 20 months, 21 months, 22 months, 23 months, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years and 6 years old.

An assistant caregiver did not have the required affidavit.

The assistant caregivers record did not contain dates of employment.

Seven students were observed having screen time during lunch and nap time.

One assistant caregiver was observed supervising 7 students alone. The caregiver was allowed access to students without a background check. Note: The background check was submitted during the inspection.

An unmounted electric heater was observed on top of a shelf. Note: pictures were taken.

A five month old was observed in a play yard with a blanket.

The playground entry was observed without a four foot fence. Note: Pictures were taken.

An above the ground pool was observed in the backyard of the operation. Note: Pictures were taken.

An above the ground pool was observed accesible to students.

An assistant caregiver did not have the required affidavit.

A pool was observed in the backyard without a four feet high fence. Note: Pictures were taken.

A five month old was observed having screen time.

Students were observed being changed on a table without raised sides.

Based on the inspection conducted, the primary caregiver is not operating the RCCH in compliance by not following with minimum standards in the day-to-day operation of the home.

An assistant caregiver did not have the required proof of education.

The operation did not have the smoke detector testing date documented.

The primary caregiver did not have the required transportation training.

The assistant caregiver did not have the required hands on portion of the CPR training.

The sign in sheet was observed with only two students signed in.

Two caregivers were observed with 11 students in care.

The operation did not have the fire extingusher inspection date documented.

The operation did not have adequate storage for the twelve students enrolled.

One five month old infant was observed in a swing for more than 15 minutes.

One caregiver was allowed access to students without a background check.

In two rooms where children utilize did not have a smoke dectection system.

The operational policy did not include infant safe sleep.

The operation did not have a completed emergency preparedness plan.

The operation policy did not include infromation about the animal on premises.