Elite City Kids Childcare and Learning Academy #2

Based on the information gathered during the inspection, sufficient evidence was available to support a caregiver engaged in a personal, non-work-related conversation through the backdoor of the facility while responsible for the care and supervision of children. The individual involved was neither an employee of the facility nor did they have a child enrolled in the facility.

Out of the five staff files evaluated, one completed CPR through the NationalCPRFoundation and four did not have verification of completing CPR.

The director failed to maintain staff files to ensure all required trainings were completed timely and available for review by Child Care Regulation upon request.

Out of the seven files for children evaluated during the inspection, three did not have the name of the physician or name of an emergency care facility listed.

Out of the seven records for children evaluated during the inspection, three were missing authorization to seek medical treatment.

Out of the six records for children evaluated during the inspection, two were missing immunization records and two immunization records were not current.

Out of the seven files for children evaluated during the inspection, two were missing the date of admission.

Out of the six records for children evaluated during the inspection, one was missing the complete address for the emergency contact.

Two of the four employee files reviewed did not have the pre employment affidavit in the file and available for review.

The information regarding the inclusive support services was not included in the operational policies.

The procedures for parent review of policies and procedures were not included in the operational policies.

The Parent Rights information was not included in the operational policies.

The information regarding indoor and outdoor physicial activity was not included in the operational policies.

The information notifying parents that the operation is a gang free zone was not included in the operation policies.

A caregiver gave a child melatonin as a means to force a child to take a nap.

Based on the information received, a caregiver gave a child melatonin to assist with falling asleep.

The caregiver left the children unattended during naptime to open the front door as she was the only staff present at the time of inspection.

Two of the six files reviewed did not include the date of admission.

Two of the four employee files reviewed did not have a notarized affidavit.

Two of the four employee files reviewed were missing the required topics for annual trainings.

Two of the fours employee files reviewed did not have proof of education in the files.

The most recent CPSC report posted in from 2021.

Five iof the six files reviewed did not have the special care needs information filled out.

The fire inspection has expired.

Of the six personnel records evaluated the following information was missing. 1. One lacked the name and address for the emergency contact. 2. One lacked the address for the emergency contact.

Children were observed playing with a small cube toy that dismantled into smaller pieces. The children placing the smaller pieces in their mouth. The pieces were small enough to fit inside a toilet paper tube.

A caregiver left a grooup of Pre-k chidlren unsupervised momentairl;y to open the front door. Children must never be left unsupervised.

This standard was evaluated in regards to a report received and compliance was not met. The caregiver responsible for the child does not have current First Aid training. This caregiver has had unsupervised access to children in care.

The First Aid Kit in the vans lacked cotton balls and adhesive tape. This was corrected at inspection.

The required emergency medical information for each child is not being taken on the van runs. This was corrected at inspection.

An additional caregiver was not in the building during naptime. The two caregivers that were present were supervising children. If only caregiver is needed to meet ratio requirements there must be an additional caregiver or employee in the building.

There were six children, ages 12 months to 21 months, with one caregiver. The specified age group was 14 months old. With this specified age group, one caregiver can only care for 5 children.

A caregiver was observed using her cell phone for personal use. Caregivers should not be using personal electronic devices while supervising children.